Emeline Hubert
PSYCHOLOGUE - PSYCHOPRATICIENNE
Tel: 06 84 48 92 36

Lozan Agreement Text

unless otherwise provided, where, as a result of the establishment of a new frontier, the hydraulic system (pipeline, flood, irrigation, drainage or similar matters) of a State depends on work carried out in the territory of another State, or if the use in the territory of one State is due to pre-war use on water or hydroelectricity from the territory of another State, an agreement shall be concluded between the States concerned in order to safeguard the interests and rights which each of them has acquired. Each of these tribunals shall be composed of three members, two of whom shall be appointed by each of the Governments concerned and who shall have the right to appoint several persons from among whom they shall elect one as a member of the Tribunal, as the case may be. The President shall be elected by mutual agreement between the two Governments concerned. The exercise of the rights of disembarkation of the said cables on non-Turkish territory and their working conditions shall be regulated amicably by the States concerned. If no agreement is reached, the dispute will be settled by arbitration. (b) leases and leases for land and houses concluded between individuals. If no agreement can be reached within two months of the entry into force of the present Treaty, the President shall be appointed, at the request of one of the Governments concerned, by the President of the Permanent International Court of Justice at The Hague from among the nationals of The Powers which have remained neutral during the war. The agreements that have been or can be concluded between Greece and Turkey on the exchange of greek and Turkish populations do not apply to the inhabitants of the islands of Imbros and Tenedos. Actions based on Articles 65, 66 and 69 shall be brought before the competent authorities within six months of the entry into force of this Treaty and, in the absence of agreement, within twelve months of the entry into force of this Treaty with the Joint Arbitral Tribunal.

The individual States concerned undertake to provide the Boundary Commission with all documents necessary for its task, including certified copies of agreements establishing existing or old borders, all existing large-scale maps, geodetic data, completed but unpublished surveys and information on changes in border waters. Maps, geodetic data and surveys, even if they are not published and are in the possession of the Turkish authorities, shall be handed over to the President of the Commission in Constantinople as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Treaty. Subject to any arrangement to be made between the Governments exercising a high degree of dignity in the countries separated from Turkey and the Governments of the countries in which the persons concerned are domiciled, Turkish nationals over the age of eighteen who reside in a territory separate from Turkey under this Treaty and who, at the time of its entry into force, habitually resident abroad: may opt for the nationality of the territory of which they are nationals if, by reason of their race, they belong to the majority of the population of that territory and subject to the consent of the Government exercising powers there. This right of option must be exercised within two years of the entry into force of this Treaty. Where, following the establishment of new frontiers, a rail link between two parts of the same country crosses another country, or where a branch line of one country has its terminus in another country, the working conditions, in so far as they concern traffic between the two countries, shall be laid down in an agreement to be concluded between the railway administrations concerned, subject to any special regime. If such authorities cannot agree on the terms of this Agreement, those terms shall be decided by arbitration. Upon the entry into force of this Treaty, subject to its provisions, multilateral treaties, conventions and agreements of an economic or technical nature between Turkey and the other Contracting Parties to this Treaty listed below shall enter into force: the Turkish Government, in agreement with the other Contracting Powers, shall release the German Government from its obligation to accept the currency of the Turkish Government during the war. Banknotes at a certain exchange rate as a payment envelope for goods to be exported from Germany to Turkey after the war. The Governments concerned shall appoint by common accord a Secretary-General for each tribunal and shall attach one or more secretaries to each tribunal. The Secretary-General and the Secretaries shall be under the command of the Tribunal, which, with the agreement of the Governments concerned, shall have the right to engage all persons in need of assistance.

Although formally a separate bilateral agreement, the agreement on the exchange of the Greek and Turkish populations was a product of Lausanne. The same applies to the Straits Convention, which allowed the free passage of warships through a partially demilitarized strait. The question of the border with Mosul remained unresolved until 1925, when the League of Nations assigned the province to Iraq. If authorisation is not granted, the data subject shall be entitled, if the circumstances so require, to compensation in proportion to the direct damage actually suffered; such compensation shall be determined by the common arbitral tribunal in the absence of an amicable settlement. The Treaty of Lausanne (French: Treaty of Lausanne) was a peace treaty negotiated at the Lausanne Conference of 1922/23 and signed on 24 July 1923 at the Palais de Rumine.[1][2] Lausanne, Switzerland It officially resolved the conflict that originally existed between the Ottoman Empire and the Allied French Republic, the British Empire, the Kingdom of Italy, the Empire of Japan, the Kingdom of Greece and the Kingdom of Romania since the beginning of The First World War. [3] The original text of the contract is in French. [3] This is the result of a second attempt at peace after the failure of the Treaty of Sèvres. The previous treaty had been signed in 1920, but was later rejected by the Turkish national movement, which fought against its terms. The Treaty of Lausanne ended the conflict and defined the borders of the modern Turkish Republic. In the treaty, Turkey renounced all its claims to the rest of the Ottoman Empire and, in return, the Allies recognized Turkish sovereignty within their new borders. [3] It provided for the exchange of Greek-Turkish population and allowed unrestricted civilian passage through the Turkish Strait (but not militarily; this would be done with the Montreux Convention). At the time of signing this Agreement, the goods, rights and interests whose return is provided for in Article 65.

have been liquidated by the authorities of one of the High Contracting Parties, that Party shall be released from the obligation to return such property, rights and interest by paying the proceeds of liquidation to the owner. If, at the request of the owner, the joint arbitral tribunal provided for in section V finds that the liquidation did not take place under conditions which ensure the achievement of a reasonable price, it shall have the power, in the absence of agreement between the parties, to order the allocation of an amount to the proceeds of the liquidation which it considers appropriate. Such property, rights and interest shall be restored if payment is not made within two months of the agreement with the owner or the above decision of the joint arbitral tribunal. The exchange of prisoners of war and interned civilians held by Greece and Turkey respectively was the subject of a separate agreement between these powers, signed in Lausanne on 30 January 1923. However, each of the contracting parties shall have the right, within three months of the entry into force of this contract, to demand performance of the contract provided that, if circumstances so require, the other party receives compensation calculated on the basis of the difference between the conditions in force at the time of conclusion of the contract and those prevailing at the time of the maintenance of the contract. In the absence of an agreement between the parties, such compensation shall be determined by the joint arbitral tribunal. Subject to agreements concluded between the High Contracting Parties, decisions and decisions since 30. October 1918, pending the entry into force of the present Treaty, decisions and orders taken by or in agreement with the authorities of the Occupying Powers of Constantinople concerning the property, rights and interests of their nationals, foreigners or Turkish nationals, as well as the relations of such persons with the authorities of Turkey shall be deemed final and shall not give rise to any claim against the Powers or their powers. Romania and Turkey will agree on fair regulation of working conditions for the Constanza-Constantinople cable. If no agreement is reached, the matter will be settled by arbitration. The remuneration of the President and that of the Secretary-General shall be determined by mutual agreement between the Governments concerned, and such remuneration and the general expenses of the Tribunal shall be paid equally by the two Governments. 3.

For lines the management of which is divided in accordance with this Treaty, the distribution of rolling stock shall be carried out by mutual friendly agreement between the administrations which take over several parts of it. .

Articles

  • unless otherwise provided, where, as a result of the establishment of a new frontier, the hydraulic system (pipeline, flood, irrigation, drainage or similar matters) of a State depends on work carried out in the territory of another State, or if the use in the territory of one State is ... [read more]
  • An RTO may not use a third party agreement to evade responsibility for compliance with the NVR Act or standards for RTOs, and is fully responsible for all services provided on its behalf. If you are wondering why an RTO would enter into an agreement with a third party to deliver a cours... [read more]
  • [19] The Agency`s non-factual exception also calls into question the Arbitrator`s decision on procedural variability on the ground that the Union was aware of the alleged infringements at the 2016 hearing. Exceptions Br. to 33 (stating that the August 2016 hearing is "the last one that ... [read more]